So, I saw
this letter in the PS this morning. I don't know if I would have responded to it, but it's terrible to see something like it and realize you've used up your quota of submissions for the month (two). Starting at the end.
We need to use logic, not emotions, when responding to
problems.
Well yeah, I can't disagree with that. The only thing is that it was the most illogical letter I've read in some time.
Some people want to ban all AR-15s because of this. Some
want to ban all rifles. Some want to ban all guns.
What percentage of people want to ban all guns? .0003? So, that's pretty much a straw man.
Suppose a very troubled teen boy drove a big black Ford
F-150 with a fast engine and big tires into a crowd of school kids on the
sidewalk, killing some and injuring others. (Terrorists in Europe have done
this.)
I'm going to call that a red herring leading into a second straw man.
Would the same critics want to ban scary Ford F-150s? How
about all Ford trucks? Would they ban any truck with a powerful engine and big
tires? How about banning all vehicles?
I'd dare say there wasn't a spot of logic in the whole letter. How do you get that F-150 into a school, church, movie theater, concert, etc. Unfortunately, his thesis was
tested by a sociopath in Charlottesville with the killing of Heather Heyer.
When it becomes an issue of mass casualties due to homicide by auto then I believe we will discuss that. In the meantime, guns are the issue.