Wait! The Second Amendment's for Everyone?

This is something I see as a problem and it certainly occurred to me as I wrote about Brave, Brave Sir Robert. Can't a large number of potential terrorists in our country also find easy access to weapons? That would seem to be a weakness inherent in the second amendment.

In related news, here's a dough-head from where-the-fck-else? Texas, talking about his concerns about allowing Syrian refugees into that benighted state.

"While the Paris attackers used suicide vests and grenades," Dale wrote, "it is clear that firearms also killed a large number of innocent victims. Can you imagine a scenario were [sic] a refugees [sic] is admitted to the United States, is provided with federal cash payments and other assistance, obtains a drivers license and purchases a weapon and executes an attack?" He urged the lawmakers to "do whatever you can to stop the [Syrian refugee] program."

​

In other words, we can't let these people in because, if they're terrorists, it would be far too easy for them to obtain firearms in this country, which is one of the blessings of liberty because freedom, that's why.

Self-awareness is not just a river in Egypt, dude.