“Republicans simply don’t acknowledge the legitimacy of
diplomacy as a tool of American power,” Senator Chris Murphy, a rising star in
the party, tells me. “Democrats have to make a loud, passionate case for
diplomacy as part of the way we keep ourselves safe. This is going to be the
seminal diplomatic achievement of this administration. It will provide us with
our best opportunity to make a case for diplomatic engagement with the rest of
the world.”
The opening to Cuba would have been the seminal achievement except this is really big. You go, Chris.
Here's Peter Beinart pointing out what I haven't seen anyone address.
Here's Peter Beinart pointing out what I haven't seen anyone address.
Even if Congress passes new sanctions, it’s quite
likely that the overall economic pressure on Iran will go down, not up. Most
major European and Asian countries have closer economic ties to Iran than does
the United States, and thus more domestic pressure to resume them. These
countries have abided by international sanctions against Iran, to varying
degrees, because the Obama administration convinced their leaders that
sanctions were a necessary prelude to a diplomatic deal. If U.S. officials
reject a deal, Iran’s historic trading partners will not economically injure
themselves indefinitely. Sanctions, declared Britain’s
ambassador to the United States in May, have already reached “the high-water
mark,” noting that “you would probably see more sanctions erosion” if nuclear
talks fail. Germany’s ambassador added that, “If diplomacy fails, then the
sanctions regime might unravel.”
It's cute that Tom Cotton et al think that the U.S. is the king of the world. But it just ain't so.
No comments:
Post a Comment