First, it is highly unlikely that even our allies in Europe
would join us in further sanctions against Iran in the wake of a nuclear
agreement they believe is sensible and positive. That is even truer for other
countries—like India, Japan, South Korea and China—that were pulled into the
existing sanctions regime quite unwillingly. The support of these countries for
the oil sanctions in particular has been critical to the sanctions’
effectiveness. They will not willingly sign up for more.
Second, if a deal falls through, it is likely that the
existing multilateral sanctions regime will begin to crumble. As noted,
countries like India and South Korea, who don’t feel threatened by an Iran
nuclear weapon, will be only too happy to find a pretext to break out of the
sanctions—perhaps tentatively at first but in a rush as others do. It will be
hard to argue the rationale for sanctions, which, from the perspective of
nearly every nation, will have achieved their purpose—bringing Iran to the table
to negotiate serious limitations on its nuclear program.
And do we want to deny producers in this country the opportunity to trade in a major market?
And .courtesy of Charles Pierce, I find that the pope is on board with the Munich Agreement 2015:
And .courtesy of Charles Pierce, I find that the pope is on board with the Munich Agreement 2015:
Pope Francis wants to give peace with Iran a chance.
Delivering his Easter message from St. Peter's Basilica at
the Vatican Sunday, the pope gave his backing to the nuclear deal reached
between Iran, the United States, China, Russia, France, the United
Kingdom and Germany.
No comments:
Post a Comment